Those who favor a strict construction of the constitution believe he powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the constitution the powers of the federal government are implied by the constitution the powers of the federal government can be easily changed and interpreted the powers of the federal government are dependent on the powers of the states

Strict textualists, like Justice Clarence Thomas, believe that A: the powers of the federal government are explicitly granted by the Constitution.

In short, if it ain't in the Constitution, the Feds can't do it in eyes of textualists. They believe that if the Framers didn't think to include it, it doesn't deserve doing.

The opposing view is that the Constitution and language have both evolved and that the Constitution has evolved with changing history and language.

would not cooperate with each other voluntarily.

question:  

the chart compares religious beliefs to us political party support.

religious beliefs and party support, 2012

this chart demonstrates that

a) more highly religious people supported the republican candidate, while more nonreligious people supported the democratic candidate.

b) more highly religious people supported the democratic candidate, while more nonreligious people supported the republican candidate.

c) more moderately religious people supported the republican candidate, while more nonreligious people supported the democratic candidate.

d) more moderately religious people supported the democratic candidate, while more nonreligious people supported the republican candidate.

answer: a.