Why wasn’t there unanimous support for the proposed us constitution, which was presented during the constitutional convention in philadelphia? a. many delegates argued that a strong central government would endanger the rights of states and individuals. b. many delegates argued that a strong central government couldn’t resolve issues such as interstate wars. c. many delegates argued that a strong central government couldn’t resolve economic crises. d. many delegates argued that a strong central government couldn’t resolve intrastate uprisings.

I believe it is A, as the tyranny of the king was fresh in the minds of the delegates, and they wanted a weak federal government to combat this.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

may i see the answer choices?