Should the u. s. government be allowed to temporarily take away certain civil liberties from its citizens in order to successfully defeat the terrorists who threaten us? if so, specifically, which civil liberties would you as a citizen be willing to give up? explain why the absence of these civil liberties would give the u. s. government an advantage over the terrorists. if you are unwilling to give up any civil liberties, what tools do you propose that the u. s. government use in combating terrorism while executing its responsibility to provide for the health, safety, and morals of the overall population?

Question 1 which of the following can be defined as a " non-public" forum? a. the inside hall of a convention hall. b. a public street corner c. the steps of a court house d. a school classroom question 2 why is it beneficial for the government to allow freedom of speech? a. by allowing freedom of speech, the government can improve by hearing and accepting criticism from the people. b. by allowing freedom of speech.the government can punish actions by it's citizens. c. by allowing freedom fo speech, the government will provide a diverse culture. d. by allowing freedom of speech, the government allows itself to be overthrown to create a better government. question 3 which of the following is an example of sedition? a. a socialist encourages military soldiers to leave the military before they are legally allowed to. b. a communist presents ideas for a new government. c. a student organizes a flag burning protest. d. the new york times is restricted from printing a story about a defense trial.