Adictator has total rule over his citizens, and may invite criticism, but never really wants it (t or f)

The statement is - False.

The dictators do have total rule, but they never invite criticism towards them. In fact, when a dictator is criticized in his own country, the one that criticizes him/her always ends up with big consequences. The consequences can range anywhere from public shaming, arresting and imprisonment, beating and torturing, and even death. In general, a dictator tends to remove all critics in the society, and use brutal force and fear in order to prevent it.

it was the new england colonies.

hope dis !

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.