Which of these are true of political action committees (pacs) but not of interest groups? select all that apply. pacs promote social causes. pacs provide financial support to political campaigns. pacs are international organizations. pacs are supported by corporate interests. pacs are regulated by the federal election commission.

The statements which are true of political action committees (PACs) but not of interest groups are:

A political action committee is a joint mutual group who comes together and pools resources in order to support a candidate from a particular political party to run for public office

An interest group on the other hand is one that has a specific goal in mind and work together to actualize this goal.

As a result of this, the statements which are true of PACs but not true of interest groups are the fact that the PAC are regulated by the electoral commision and they provide support financially, while interest groups do not.

Therefore the correct answers are options B and E

Read more here:

link

The correct answer is B) PACs provide financial support to political campaigns and E) are regulated by the Federal Election Commission.

The statements that are true of Political Action Committees (PAC) but not of interest groups are PACs provide financial support to political campaigns and are regulated by the Federal Election Commission.  

In politics, a Political Action Committee is a group of people that organizes and join together with the idea of rising money to decide on candidates in a political party. What are true of Political Action Committees but not of interest groups are PACs provide financial support to political campaigns, and are regulated by the Federal Election Commission. As PACs rise, fund, and spend money in candidates to support them, they provide financial support and must be regulated by the Federal Commission because PACs represent the interests of labor organizations or business organizations.

i think it was because of how protected egyptian civilization was was which allowed them to evolve without much outside influence.

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005