What would have happened if the first attack on the world trade center (in 1993) had been successful? a. one tower would have collapsed into the other, killing thousands and destroying a purported symbol of wealth and greed. b. one tower would have collapsed, and people in the second, terrorists thought, would use the incident to force their government to abandon occupation of islamic lands. c. both towers would have stood, but the damage would have been so obvious that americans would pressure the government to abandon its military bases in the middle east. d. the terrorists didn't care whether the attack was successful, as it was a training mission preparing militants for their roles in the subsequent september 11 massacre.

The correct answer is A) One tower would have collapsed into the other, killing thousands and destroying a purported symbol of wealth and greed.

What would have happened if the first attack on the World Trade Center (in 1993) had been successful is that one tower would have collapsed into the other, killing thousands and destroying a purported symbol of wealth and greed.

On February 26, 1993, a bomb exploded below the second World Trade Center tower. It was 12:38 in the afternoon. The terrorist exploded 1,200 pounds of explosives, killing 6 people and more than 1000 people were injured. This attack proved the vulnerability of the country in the prevention of terrorist attacks.

explanation:

i have ni idea

the punishment for breaking the law would depend on the conditions or the seriousness of the law being broken, if he or she breaks the law while doing some great discovery or invention then it would classify as a scientific fraud. there are other words to describe the crime but scientific fraud would be the harshest one.