subject
History, 11.07.2019 04:00 jeanieb

In which case did the supreme court rule that in addition to the suspicion required to justify a stop, the officer must have reasonable suspicion that the person stopped is "armed" and "dangerous" before a frisk can be conducted? a. adams v. williams b. bradford v. ray c. payton v. new york d. terry v. ohio?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Question 1(multiple choice worth 5 points) the yalta conference failed to achieve which outcome? germany would be divided into zones of occupation. stalin would support the effort to create the united nations. stalin would join the war against japan after germany's defeat. german zones of occupation would have free elections.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
In the debate over independence, which of these are arguments a loyalist would have made? check all that apply.
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
6. why did louis xvi call a meeting of the estates-general in 1789? how long had it been since such a meeting had been called?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Which of the following is true about a merger? a. it is an example of deregulation. c. it is a combination of two or more companies into a single firm. b. it violates the sherman anti-trust act of 1890. d. it always leads to economic growth.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In which case did the supreme court rule that in addition to the suspicion required to justify a sto...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 18.08.2019 02:20
Questions on the website: 13722362