What is one way to avoid making a bad argument based on textual evidence? a. don't try to interpret the textual evidence. b. double check any quotes used in the argument. c. think critically about your assumptions. d. none of the above

One very effective way to avoid making a bad argument based on textual evidence is:  C. Think critically about your assumption When making an argument we need to critically evaluate any asumption we make in order to avoid falling into fallacies.

So the answer to this question is:

C. Think critically about your assumption

the french revolution main idea was to give power to the people. the revolution was influenced by the enlightenment ideas, reasoning and skepticism pushed people to revolt against standards and norms in french society.

the problem was that the revolution caused political turmoil, and napoleon saw this as an opportunity and launched a coup d’état in november 1799. he became the first consul of france and later named french emperor.

some people see napoleon as a hero of the revolution and others see him as a traitor.

people see him as a traitor because he noticed the political turmoil and used this moment to rise to power. others see him as a hero of the revolution because he had some political and military achievements - in which he was committed to promoting the achievements of the french revolution - he had extensive public constructions, made a civil reform.

in a bigger picture, napoleon had some huge achievements in france which made him very important, but the fact that he seized power to himself makes him an undeniable traitor to the revolution since the main idea of it was to remove people from power and give power to the people.

besides the fact that abraham lincoln abolished slavery, and greatly benefit black people, he had a heavy impact of the definition of what democracy was, and should be.