General motors' stand against apartheid in south africa was based upon what came to be known as the human rights movement the sullivan principles cultural relativism the international principles

General motors' stand against apartheid in south africa was based upon what came to be known as sullivan principles.

Further Explanation:

Sullivan principles:

The Sullivan principles are the names of two corporate implicit rules, created by the African-American evangelist Rev. Leon Sullivan, advancing corporate social obligation: The first Sullivan standards were created in 1977 to apply financial weight on South Africa in dissent of its arrangement of politically-sanctioned racial segregation.  

lawful noteworthiness of the Sullivan case:  

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, lawful case in which, on March 9, 1964, the U.S. Preeminent Court administered consistently (9–0) that, for a defamation suit to be fruitful, the complainant must demonstrate that the culpable articulation was made with 'genuine vindictiveness' that is, with information that it was false or with neglectful negligence.  

the decision in New York Times v Sullivan:  

In a consistent choice, the United States Supreme Court decided for the New York Times. So as to demonstrate criticism, an "open authority" must demonstrate that the paper acted "with 'genuine malevolence' that is, with information that it was false or with careless dismissal" for truth.

Subject: history  

Level: college

Keywords: Sullivan principles, lawful noteworthiness of the Sullivan case, the decision in New York Times v Sullivan.

Related links:  

Learn more about evolution on

General Motors' stand against apartheid in South Africa was based upon what came to be known as Sullivan Principles.

Further Explanations:

The Sullivan principles denote the commercial codes of behaviour, established by the African-American evange list “Rev. Leon Sullivan”  pointing at fostering commercial social concerns.The original Sullivan principle was developed in 1977 to impose economic pressure on South Africa regarding the abolishing of the Apartheid system. It was also postulated to apply monetary weight on South Africa in its organization of politically-sanctioned racial exclusion.

“New York Times Co.” versus “Sullivan”, case of 9th March, 1964, of the Court ruled that the complainant must reveal that the culpable enunciation was made with genuine malice that is, the information that presented was false or with neglectful carelessness.  In a reliable choice, the Supreme Court gave the ruling in errand of the New York Times. So to exhibit criticism, an "open authority" must validate that the paper submitted.

Learn more

Answer Details

Grade: High school

Subject: History

Chapter: Sullivan principles

Keywords:

Sullivan principles, lawful of the Sullivan case, the decision in New York Times v Sullivan,Sullivan principles, African-American, Rev. Leon Sullivan, Sullivan principle, Apartheid system,open authority

hi huh

on 6 november american voters will elect members of the house of representatives and the senate, which together are called congress.

both houses of congress are currently controlled by the republican party, which backs president donald trump.

the democrats think they can win control of the house of representatives this year by winning a majority of seats.

doing so would let them block or delay the president’s plans by refusing to enact them.

all 435 seats in the house of representatives are up for election.

if the democrats want to take control of the house by having the most seats, they’re going to have to claim at least 23 from the republicans.

graphic: the battle for the house of representatives