How did phoenician colonies prove valuable when the assyrians attacked phoenicia

The correct answer is - B. The colonies were available for the Phoenicians to flee to.

The Phoenicians were not a civilization known for waging wars, but instead it was a civilization that was focused on exploring the seas and trade. This contributed to them making multiple colonies along the coasts of the Mediterranean, some of which where on the mainland, while others were on the islands. This allowed the Phoenicians to have safe territories in case of an attempted invasion in their homeland, like the Assyrians did, so they used them to save themselves are continue with their ways without having to be submitted to anyone.

you didn't give any answers to choose from so i can't with this but, i do know something that the mexican government would be worried about and that is the wall that donald trump is currently trying to get up.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is