Which of the following explains why the united states and european countries began playing a more active role in middle eastern politics in the early 20th century? a. israel was captured by palestinian arabs who forced all jews to leave the country. b. western businesses found large oil reserves throughout the middle east. c. the ottoman empire had developed the world's most powerful military. d. muslim extremists began trying to overthrow middle eastern democracies.

B. Western businesses found large oil reserves throughout the Middle East.

Explanation:

Unsatisfied with advancement in the Middle East, the US adopted another strategy to the equivalent assigned undertakings of harmony and territorial enrollment. In spite of the fact that the outcomes were frequently progressively sensational, at last the new attitude was presumably not any more viable. It very well may be best described by the new proactive position it took in the Arab-Israeli clash through a pledge to Israel.  

This relationship has been the most predictable and least addressed part of the US Middle East strategy. Only preceding, and following its autonomy, the subject of Israel was a disputable one in the United States. Policymakers realized that the production of a Jewish state in an Arab world would destabilize the Middle East and encourage Soviet interruption. In any case, the genius Israel weight was enormous. A little while later, Jewish powers had persuaded government officials and the nation to help Israel. Key authorities were liable to a steady flood of master Israel nonentities and Jewish pioneers. Likewise, the Jewish people group were a generous and ground-breaking possibility for chose legislators and for hopefuls in races. Realistic pictures filled in as suggestions to the all inclusive community of the hardships and enduring the Jews suffered amid the war. The nation was step by step expended in the expert Israel estimation. On an increasingly inconspicuous dimension, the country was normally progressively slanted to help the Jews: the Arab culture, and subsequently their circumstance was "outside" and troublesome for Americans to relate to. These variables added to a force which eventually left policymakers with no decision yet to help the new country.  

In spite of this solid help for Israel, the arrangement on the Arab-Israeli clash was subjected to the more extensive strategy of holding the line against Soviet development by structure a progressively dynamic arrangement of regulation. This was the responsibility, in principle. The United States needed to extend a picture of unbiased. In any case, the association with Israel dirtied that picture, and added to a general sentiment of doubt by the Arabs.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

a

explanation: