In the court ruled that only in exceptionally rare cases could the government stop the printing of a story, overturning a conviction and invalidating the law that led to the conviction.

Near vs Minnesota

In this Supreme Court case, the court ruled that the First Amendment protected free speech and that the prior rulings were a violation of freedom of the Press which is protected in the Constitution. As a result, the court overturned thr prior conviction

a

explanation:

the correct answers are 1, 2 5, 6