When an issue creates disagreement among the states, how does federalism solve the problem? each state is allowed to make its own decision about the issue. federal and state powers are equal, so the issue has to be debated. since federal powers are superior, the constitution is applied. the national government creates unique rules for each of the states.

Since federal powers are superior, the Constitution is applied.

Explanation:

Such principle is held in the Supremacy Clause found in Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution. The clause establishes that all federal laws are the supreme law of the land and therefore all states, federal officers and judges are bound by it, which means that when an issue creates disagreement among the states or when there is a conflict between state and federal laws, the Constitution (the federal laws) should be applied.

pennsylvania pennsylvania colony was a proprietary colony founded when william penn was awarded a charter by king charles ii in 1681. he set up the colony as one of religious freedom. the government included a representative legislature with popularly elected officials. all taxpaying freemen could vote.

i hope this

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: