Which method separates modern historians from ancient greek historians? a. basing historical accounts on reliable evidence b. basing history on witnesses' views of events c. use of a narrative to tell a story about history d. use of a broad perspective to give a wide view of events

A. Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence.

Explanation:

Although Greek historians were remarkable for their time, and much of what we know of Antiquity is due to them, they had some shortcomings when compared to modern historians. One of the main problems that they displayed was the fact that Greek historians did not always base their historical accounts on reliable evidence. Often, Greek historians would ignore or dismiss evidence in favor of stereotypes or biases. In modern times, historians try to stay away from this in order to provide as objective a perspective as possible.

brainliest is someone you pick by simply clicking a button. it only shows up if there are two people that answered your question, then you decide who answer more accurately with detail and explanation and you give that person the title "brainliest".

i hope this your understandings.

answer: sorry but maybe take a pic of the map so nobody's confused

explanation: