What was the significance of the supreme court decision bush v. gore? answers?

The significance of the Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore was that it suspended the recounting of votes in Florida, thus indirectly giving presidency to George W. Bush.

Explanation:

Bush v. Gore was the case with which the Supreme Court of the United States decided the dispute over the presidential election of 2000. On November 8 the Florida Electoral Committee had announced the victory of Bush in the state for less than 0.5% of the votes. Gore then asked for a recount of the cards, but since the recount could not be completed within the legal limits, the lawsuit began. On December 9, the Supreme Court first stopped the recount of the votes that was taking place in Florida.

The Court, with 5 in favor and 4 against, decided that it was not possible to establish an alternative method for recounting the votes by 12 December, a time limit established by federal law. Seven of the nine judges agreed to recognize a violation of the equal protection clause in using different counting methods in different counties. Three judges also believed that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, section 1, paragraph 2 of the Constitution, misinterpreting the electoral law passed by the Florida Parliament.

After the ruling, Florida's Secretary of State Katherine Harris confirmed George W. Bush's victory in Florida: the 25 great voters so obtained gave Bush, the Republican candidate, 271 great voters, one more than the 270 required to win in the Electoral College and defeating the Democratic candidate Al Gore, who obtained 266 votes (a voter from the District of Columbia abstained). The Court's decision raised many criticisms and controversies.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.