How would the circulatory and respiratory systems be affected by asthma? A-The circulatory system would have a significantly reduced supply of oxygen in the blood, causing oxygen delivery to cells to be reduced

B-The circulatory system would have a significantly reduced supply of oxygen in the blood, causing oxygen delivery to cells to be increase

C- The respiratory system would have difficulty delivering enough oxygen to the lungs because the airway are not wide enough

D-The respiratory system would have difficulty delivering enough oxygen to the lungs because the person would be breathing too rapidly

Glaucoma is an eye disease that is manifested by high intraocular pressure (iop). the distribution of iop measurements in the general population is approximately normal with mean 16 mm hg and standard deviation 3 mm hg. a random sample of 9 people is selected from the general population. the sample mean iop is 17.2 mm hg with a sample standard deviation of 3.9 mm hg. a) the mean of the sampling distribution of x is 16 mm hg. b) the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of x is 1.3 mm hg. c) the sample mean of every sample of size 9 will be 17.2 mm hg d) none of the answers are true. e) exactly 2 of the answers are true.

Which of the following must be cooked to 145º f? a. chicken and stuffing b. ground beef and eggs not served immediately c. beef roasts and seafood d. all of these must be cooked to 145° f.

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.