I need help plz and thank you Critical Thinking Questions

Please answer each of the following questions in complete sentences.

1. Although working out with friends has many benefits, what are some possible drawbacks? Explain.

2. One of the benefits of working out with others is that it can keep you safe. What are some activities that may be safer when performed with other people? Explain.

3. One of the tips given for keeping the group happy is to give feedback. Imagine that you are playing soccer and you notice that one of your teammates isn’t sharing the ball and isn’t working as a team member very well. How would you give them feedback in a kind and helpful way?

4. The unit talks about how great athletes or fitness figures don’t always stick to one activity and like to switch it up, like Dwain Chambers. Can you think of any other athletes or fitness figures who participated in more than one activity professionally? Why do you think they do this?

5. The unit discusses the four stages of group building in fitness—forming, storming, norming, and performing. Do you think that these four stages can be applied to other types of situations or activities besides fitness? Discuss and give an example

Which of the following types of food would you generally put a demi-glace on? a.poached fish b.beef tenderloin c.cooked asparagus d.chicken lasagna e.vegetable au gratin

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.

Which type of nerve creates a 'mental map" of the relative positioning of the body at any given point in time?