Why might avoiding a jury trial be in the best inertest of one or both parties invovled?

Because it might prevent the involvement of sentiments.

Explanation:

It should be understood that , to serve on a jury or be on a jury means sitting down with a group of people who'll decide on the facts of a criminal or civil case.

The role of the jury is that, the jury listens to the evidence during a trial, decides what facts the evidence has established, and draws inferences from those facts to form the basis for their decision.

The only reason why the jury system might be considered as good is when they are doing what they are supposed to do. But , in some cases sentiments might influence their decision, This is usually , when the majority have interest in one of the claimant or defendant.

And this is the reason why , the judge trial is considered to be better when compared to the jury trial.

to prevent people from getting the ebola virus, countries around the world paid to doctors develop a new vaccine. now that the vaccine has been made, doctors will need to experiment on a large number of people to find out if it works safely.

what is the greatest limitation that scientists are dealing with as they try to figure out how to experiment with the ebola vaccine?

meditation is a practice of sitting still and quiet for minutes or even hours. it has been practiced for thousands of years and is even a part of religious practices for some people. carefully controlled, repeated measurements of brain activity have shown that meditation does increase certain chemicals in the brain and even grows the part of the brain that people connect with their current surroundings and activities.

are claims about the effects of meditation most likely scientific or pseudoscientific?

not pseudoscientific, because people have made claims about it but scientific observations have not been made

steady state because it the only on that maes sense