Which of the following is a doctrine available to defendants whereby a defendant may avoid liability by establishing that the plaintiff voluntarily and unreasonably encountered the risk of theactual harm that the defendant caused?

A. Last-clear-chance doctrine.
B. Assumption of the risk doctrine.
C. Contributory negligence doctrine.
D. Res ipsa loquitur.
E. Negligence per se

B.Assumption of the risk doctrine.

Explanation:

B is the correct answer because according to that doctrine someone is voluntarily encountering the risk therefore cannot sue the defendant. For eg alot of places do this where injury can occur like scuba diving, skating complexes, bungee jumping, and other sports. Because as a participant you know that you might encounter a risk but you are doing it voluntarily hence you cannot sue for any liabilities.

my kitchen has a fire extinguisher and smoke detector.never overloaded sockets.no frayed cords.yes my sockets are sealed.yes i always have lights on with no clutter.yes handrails is secure.yes firplace is protected.yes my fireplace is cleaned often.no i point handle in with stove off.stove is cleaned regularly.yes knifes are high up.no talking while chewing ew! yes cleaners are locked up.my shower is slip proof and my medications are high up from reach.never keep oil saturated rugs or rags.my carpet is new.my kitchen has a fire extinguisher and smoke detector.never overloaded sockets.no frayed cords.yes my sockets are sealed.yes i always have lights on with no clutter.yes handrails is secure.yes firplace is protected.yes my fireplace is cleaned often.no i point handle in with stove off.stove is cleaned regularly.yes knifes are high up.no talking while chewing ew! yes cleaners are locked up.my shower is slip proof and my medications are high up from reach.never keep oil saturated rugs or rags.my carpet is new.

i hope this have an amazing day!

that was alot for five