Aworld-renowned health clinic with a focus on medical care, research, and education offers several health articles on its website. one of these articles is about weight-loss basics. the article states that weight loss comes down to watching calories. fad diets do not work. to lose weight you most burn more calories than you take in, which you can do by reducing extra calories from food and by burning calories through exercise. the article byline is “clinic staff.” the clinic staff editors are experienced clinicians and educators who have broad knowledge of many areas of medicine and disease management. the specialty editors are leaders in their particular area of medicine—for example, asthma, cancer, and heart disease. the article about weight loss was written one year ago, and the date is listed at the bottom of the article. the online article’s sidebars offer links to expert answers, additional articles, respected health organizations, food tracker tools, and multimedia files with videos about nutrition.
write one or two sentences, defending the credibility of each aspect of the article:
1. source/author/creator
2. additional resources
3. timeliness of information
4. purpose
5. point of view

Hello there!

After reading the description about based on the 'website' of the clinicians, we would have to find details in the passage that would explain more about the following aspects on the 'website'.

1.Source/author/creator

2.Additional resources

3.Timeliness of information

4.Purpose

5.     Point of view

Therefore, lets get started on identifying these aspects from what we've read in the article above.

1.   Source/author/creator : The article explains that this site is sourced through  certain "clinic staff members".  And based on this, these would practically be the people who would help you e.g : lose weight, asthma, cancer, and heart disease etc. And, also, some of these people would most likely designed the link page. Therefore, from the passage about, my clue from it would be the following... "The article byline is “Clinic Staff.” The Clinic Staff editors are experienced clinicians and educators who have broad knowledge...".

2.   Additional resources: Based from the article above, we see that the 'additional resources' would be for e.g : side bars of more data regarding the article you would be reading, or also, other topic that you may find certain interest. And based from this, I found this information in article, and it would also be the following: "The online article’s sidebars offer links to expert answers, additional articles, respected health organizations, food tracker tools, and multimedia files with videos about nutrition. "

3.  Timeliness of information: From the article, it stated that: " The article about weight loss was written one year ago, and the date is listed at the bottom of the article." As we see above, the bold sentence above explain that there is a timeline of information. So, indeed, this 'website' is quite persist.

4.  Purpose: We know the purpose of this website, and, it's obviously to help people with certain problems such as for example, asthma, cancer, and heart disease, and also, in the beginning of the article, it stated that "a world-renowned health clinic with a focus on medical care, research, and education offers several health articles on its website. " So, from this, we can see the purpose of this 'website'.

5.  Point of view: Read the following statement from the article listed below in bold : "The article states that weight loss comes down to watching calories. Fad diets do not work. To lose weight you most burn more calories than you take in, which you can do by reducing extra calories from food and by burning calories through exercise." We see that in this 'website', we see that they have their own point of view, they feel that 'fad diets' are not good, and they think that it does not work. So from this, we see that they have their own 'point of view" on there cases.

I really hope this helps everyone! :)

yes you do or he will not stop with that

they cheat and apolgize adn they do it again