What conclusion can be drawn from these two diagrams? Pacific
Ocean
North
America
Iceland is located on a convergent boundary, while Los Angeles is located on a divergent boundary.
Both Iceland and San Francisco are located on a divergent boundary.
Los Angeles will fall into the ocean one day
Iceland is located on a divergent boundary, while San Francisco is located on a transform boundary.

I think its B

Explanation: both of the plates are moving away from each other

the correct answers are:

a - pacific plate;

it is the biggest oceanic tectonic plate. surrounded on all sides by continental tectonic plates, it is submerging and gradually becoming smaller and smaller.

b - north american plate;

huge continental plate, occupying big portion of the northern hemisphere.

c -eurasian plate;

alongside the north american plate, it is one of the two dominant continental plates in the northern hemisphere.

d - indian plate;

a small continental plate, that has been part of gondwanaland initially, but after the break up of it, moved towards northeast and pushed into the eurasian plate that was once part of laurasia.