Explain how the quality of someone's life can be measured socially, economically, and environmentall.

Social indicators such as health and levelsof crime, subjective well-being measures (assessing people’s evaluative reactionsto their lives and societies), and economic indices. These alternative indicatorsassess three philosophical approaches to well-being that are based, respectively,on normative ideals, subjective experiences, and the ability to select goods andservices that one desires. The strengths and weaknesses of the various approachesare reviewed. It is argued that social indicators and subjective well-being measuresare necessary to evaluate a society, and add substantially to the regnant economicindicators that are now favored by policy makers. Each approach to measuring thequality of life contains information that is not contained in the other measures

Explanation:

https://lemosandcrane.co.uk/resources/RISE%20Measuring%20quality%20of%20life.pdf

there's multiple reasons why the conquistadors were so successful in colonizing central america, and some of them are:

- they were seen as gods;

at the beginning, the spanish settlers were seen by the natives as gods, and this was mainly due to their white skin, and the way they came with their boats.

- possessed superior weaponry;

the spanish had gunpowder and guns, as well as cannons, while the natives did not had any fire weapons.

- made cleaver alliances;

they used the situation of tribes hating each other, so they made alliances with some of them which served them very well.

- brought diseases;

the native people were not immune to certain diseases the europeans brought with them, so they were dying from seeming harmless things for european standards.

lies are not protected speech because they have no social value.