"what is one difference scientists noticed in parts of zion national park that had higher species diversity compared with regions with lower species diversity? " areas with lower diversity had higher rates of erosion./ areas with higher diversity had less rainfall. / areas with lower diversity had less rainfall.

Areas with lower diversity had higher rates of erosion.

Explanation:

(I'm mainly answering this question to confirm that this answer is correct! I took the quiz and this was the correct option.) :D

the wrong statement is - c. a desert had more biodiversity than a marsh.

the deserts are one of the places of the planet where there's the least biodiversity. the reasons for that are the climate and the lack of food sources, which hampers both the number of the species that can survive in it, and the number of the individuals in the species itself.

the marshes, on the other hand, are places where there's perfect conditions for lots of organisms to thrive. the temperature is moderate and nice, the amount of water and the food sources are on a high level, so there's an abundance of both plant and animal life in them.

largest usa states are texas north dakota california

globally saudi arabia russia usa