According to this world map of potential renewable energy, what can you infer about the potential of biomass energy compared to hydroelectricity in north america?
a. the potential for biomass energy is slightly greater than hydroelectricity
b. the potential for hydroelectricity and biomass are the same
c. there is not enough data available to answer this question
d. the potential for hydroelectricity is greater than biomass energy

According to world map of potential renewable energy, the potential for biomass energy is slightly greater than hydroelectricity North America.

Option A

Explanation:

The potential for biomass energy is slightly greater than hydroelectricity. This is mainly because of the fact that for the generation of hydroelectricity, several dams need to be constructed. In North America, there is not enough place for the construction of dams.

Dams require a lot of place for construction and in North America, there are only a few places where construction of dams is feasible. For biomass, the energy units are small in size and can be easily constructed. This is why biomass energy plants can be installed in any place where biomass is available or can be made available.

since there isn't any suggested answers i will give you the reason and hopefully you can figure it

south africa, or rather all of africa, has not been in the location in which it is nowadays throughout the geological past. after the super-continent pangaea started to break apart, gondwanaland, in which was africa, moved further south, and parts of it came to be very close to the south pole. because the climate in this part of the world is very cold due to the very dispersed sun rays in there, what is now south africa, started to freeze, and the conditions were right for the formation of glaciers. the glaciers existed up until the period when gondwanaland started to break apart and what is now africa started to move towards north, sp it warmed up and the glaciers melted.

no it is not. kenya allows smoking weed.