subject
Geography, 05.08.2019 16:10 zuleromanos

In one hypothesis about the origin of life on earth, scientists propose that organic molecules were produced from inorganic molecules in chemical reactions. how would you evaluate a scientist's claim that reactions, showing organic molecules emerging from inorganic molecules, can be seen in nature today?
a) the claim must be false because modern-day evolution cannot be observed and recorded.
b) the claim is likely to be false because the current conditions on earth are opposed to the formation of life.
c) the claim is likely to be true because all the elements necessary for the formation of organic molecules are present on earth.
d) the claim must be true because scientists are able to replicate these reactions in a lab.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Geography

question
Geography, 22.06.2019 02:30
What's the weather like where you live?
Answers: 2
question
Geography, 22.06.2019 10:00
The yellow river is also known as the huang he river? true or false
Answers: 2
question
Geography, 22.06.2019 15:00
How did the lab activities you answer the lesson question: what effect does plate movement have on geologic events and structures at earth’s surface? what did you learn from conducting this lab?
Answers: 2
question
Geography, 24.06.2019 04:20
Rectangle qrst is shown. angle qrt is congruent to angle str, and angle str is complementary to angle qtr. which statement is true about angles qrt and qtr? they are congruent. they are complementary. they are supplementary. they are right angle
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In one hypothesis about the origin of life on earth, scientists propose that organic molecules were...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 22.03.2021 23:50
question
Mathematics, 22.03.2021 23:50
Questions on the website: 13722363