How were the miranda v arizona and gideon v. wainwright cases similar apex

The Miranda v Arizona and Gideon v. Wainwright cases were similar in the sense that the both cases resulted in "expanded protections" for people "accused of crimes".

Explanation:

In both the cases of the Miranda v Arizona and Gideon v. Wainwright the statement was made admissible only when the individual understands their rights. So the "Supreme Court" ruled the defendant's statements as inadmissible until they were informed about their right to have their own attorney during the questioning process in both the cases.

The  franco-prussian  war, a  war  that was  led by prussia a coalition of  german  states, defeated  france. the  war  was the end  of  french  hegemony in europe and resulted in a unified  germany.  i hope this !

The problem of malnutrition in bangladesh is caused in part by "over population."hope my answer has you : )