Though simon followed all safety protocols, he was injured at work because a machine was not properly guarded. even though there is no reasonable belief that drug use contributed to the employee’s injury, his employer required him to take a drug test after he reported the injury. did the employer misuse a drug testing program against simon for reporting an injury? a. yes b. no

The answer is A. No.

Although there is no comprehensive federal drug-testing law, states regulate the use of drug testing programs, and while some establish that testing has to be performed under "reasonable suspicion" or "probable cause" situations, others explicitly authorize random testing under other circumstances.  

As a general rule, testing is considered to be lawful unless there is a determined restriction in state or federal law. Since this is not specified in Simon's case, testing after his accident can help decide whether drugs or alcohol were a factor, and by doing it his employer is acting within the law. Anyways, this testing should always be performed under pre-established criteria.

im not to sure

the statement that best explains why the tenth amendment reserves some rights and powers to states is that the framers believed in the principle of federalism. this principle says that some powers are in the hands of a centralized national government, while others are reserved for the governments of several states.