“the bane of the internet” is written in first-person subjective point of view, so the narrator tells the story as it is happening tells the story as it is happened in the past is a minor character who tells the story as it is happening none of the above

B). tells the story as it is happened.

Explanation:

The point of view is illustrated as the perspective or lenses through which the author reveals the narrative and the audience perceives a particular text. Out of varied point-of-views employed by the authors, 'first-person subjective' is one of them that discloses or unfolds the story through the author's memory and therefore, narrated as it occurred without any alteration.

As per the question, since "The Bane of the Internet" is authored in a 'first-person subjective point of view' thus, the narrator reveals the story 'as it happened' in the past. Such perspective usually displays the story from an author's/character's(not necessarily minor) perspective or opinions. However such points of view could be very limiting yet it reveals the story as it happened. Thus, option B is the correct answer.

i used to know but i learned it a long time ago sorry

explanation:

the author is intending to draw attention to the plight of refugees, editorial and biography support this. both workpieces make the reader empathize with enrique as well as with the other young migrants from central america. the writer, however, is using a different approach to each text.

the editorial includes strong words to persuade readers. he is trying hard to convince readers in the us to change its refugee approach.

the biography relies on narrative techniques and figurative language which the writer uses wisely in the setting, characterization, and personification to educate readers on the topic.