When is an argument considered to be a logical fallacy? when the argument doesn't make sense when an illogical premise is presented with logical supporting information when there is a logical premise without data to support it when a logical premise is supported by very general claims when the author or speaker is not a credible representative of the topic when a logical premise is supported by claims that don't address the argument's point when certain claims only seem to lead to other, unsupported claims

Can someone me with an english language arts assignment? i need someone who's an expert or good at english language ! i need correct answers only !

Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.

Examine the public service ad. how does this ad transmit a cultural value? by sharing relevant high school graduation statistics by promoting a new type of educational program by reminding the public of the need for new schools by encouraging people to strive for more education