Read the claim, related reason, and evidence a student wrote about "the most dangerous game.” claim: rainsford should not kill zaroff. reason: rainsford believes that men should not hunt other men. evidence: "surely your experiences in the war—" "did not make me condone cold-blooded murder," finished rainsford stiffly. which explanation best states how the evidence supports the student’s reason? killing a man compromises rainsford’s beliefs. killing zaroff will not end the hunting game. killing prey will prove rainsford’s skills. killing a general is a declaration of war.

The correct answer is killing a man compromises Rainsford's beliefs. Zaroff his antagonist seems to be more civilized and refined but is actually the most savage.

love, how my life is right now. you can be loved and can love others. sometimes you dont feel loved right now, dont worry, someone out there is loving you while you are away.

situational archetype describes the adventures of hero. the examples of situational archetypes are the quest, good vs evil, the task which represent respectively search, good forces, characters vs the evil ones and a certain job that must be done. from the given options, we cannot observe the subplot the beauty and the beast which is a correct answer for this question.