English, 03.08.2019 08:00 taylorannsalazar

How do judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion? a) the arguments of the dissent are reviewed and summarized b) in the dissent, the majority opinion itself is used as evidence c) notes taken by the attorneys are used to support the dissent's argument. d) the dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: kimlyn58p0wyn0

The difference is that in dissent, the majority opinion is used as evidence, as shown in option B.

We can arrive at this answer because:

Dissent is a term that refers to permission to disagree with an official legal position, especially when it comes to a collective decision.In this case, the dissent is formed by a group of people who disagree with the decisions taken by a majority.In a court of law, a majority decision occurs when more than half of the jurors issue a position. Dissent is a separate opinion that disagreed with the majority.

When there are cases of dissent, the majority decision is used as evidence, while the majority decision does not consider dissent as evidence under any circumstances.

More information:

link

Answer from: Quest

Last week emma forgot her sister’s birthday

Answer from: Quest

pre-writing

why we feel good, or better, when we laugh?

is there a scientific explanation for this to happen?

which are the sources?

rough draft

laughter has a way of instantly connecting people and is one of the most basic and fundamental ways in which we communicate as human beings.

newport academy: endorphins reduce stress and strength social connections.

they combat anxiety and depression.

final draft

we know that when we laugh we feel better; when something is making us laugh it means we thought it was funny at some point, even if it was not meant that way. what we know is that it made us feel good. that is something we all can realize easily, but is it a chemical explanation for it to happen? of course there

according to joe bluett, laughter has a way of instantly connecting people and is one of the most basic and fundamental ways in which we communicate as human beings. also, he says that laughter can increase confidence, self-esteem, creativity, positivity and resilience, bringing positive changes to all aspects of our lives.

the newport academy says that, when we laugh, we release endorphins and that makes our body feel instantly relieved from tension and worry. endorphins also reduce stress and strength social connections.

therefor, laughter is the best to combat anxiety and depression.

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 16:30

Which statement best explains why shakespeare has cassius use the word fawn rather than a synonym such as flatter to describe his actions?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 23:10

When i was young enough to still spend a long time buttoning my shoes in the morning, i'd listen toward the hall: daddy upstairs was shaving, in the bathroom, and mother downstairs was frying the bacon. they would begin whispering back and forth to each other up and down the stairwell. my father would whistle his phrase, my mother would try to whistle, then hum hers backi drew my buttonhook in and out and listened to it -know it was "the merry widow." the difference was, their song almost floated with laughter. how different from the record, which growled from the beginning, as if the victrola were only slowly being wound up. they kept it running between them, up and down the stairs where i was now just about ready to run clattering down and show them my shoes. what is the effect of the parallelism used in the above excerpt? it establishes the rhythm of a duet to echo the song. it expresses the same ideas. it mirrors opposite ideas. it is a paradox.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 03:00

This is a set of words that begins with a preposition.

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 04:30

Armed with invisible ink, a cipher system, and a passion to end the war and preserve the union, elizabeth van lew became butler's eyes and ears in the confederate capital city. truth be told, however, she became much more than that. she became a spymaster, the person responsible for running a network of agents, couriers, and safe houses that was very active during the war. in addition to the spying, elizabeth van lew continued to maintain her church hill home as a safe house and something of a local union spy headquarters. —the dark game, paul janeczko what is the central idea of this passage? van lew’s home was used as a safe house, which was critical to the confederacy. van lew had a passion to end the war and preserve the union. van lew was a spymaster, a leading force in the espionage activities for the union. van lew did not enjoy working for general butler.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

How do judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion? a) the arguments...

Questions