Which sentence best combines these independent clauses? it was cold. sharon went out in a t-shirt. the wind blew in sharp gusts. while the wind blew in sharp gusts, sharon went out in a t-shirt, and it was cold. even though it was cold and the wind blew in sharp gusts, sharon went out in a t-shirt. because sharon went out in a t-shirt, and it was cold, the wind blew in sharp gusts. the wind blew in sharp gusts and it was cold after sharon went out in a t-shirt.

answer: idk

explanation:

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)