Read the passage. and this is no small distinction. it is the whole distinction in a man. you cannot serve two masters; you must serve one or the other. if your work is first with you, and your fee second, work is your master. which best evaluates the reasoning in the passage? a) the reasoning is not sound; the author uses an either-or argument b) the reasoning is not sound; the author relies on name-calling c) the reasoning is not sound; the author uses circular logic d) the reasoning is not sound; the author relies on overgenerlization