subject
English, 12.07.2019 20:00 ronniethefun

Read this excerpt from winston churchill's "their finest hour" speech: some people will ask why, then, was it that the british navy was not able to prevent the movement of a large army from germany into norway across the skagerrak? . . [b]ecause of the distance, we could give no air support to our surface ships, and . . were compelled to use only our submarines. . our submarines took a heavy toll but could not, by themselves, prevent the invasion of norway. in the channel and in the north sea, on the other hand, our superior naval surface forces, aided by our submarines, will operate with close and effective air assistance. which statement best explains one way that the structure of this excerpt is effective? a. it reminds the english people that their navy has taken a heavy toll on german ships. b. it uses a rhetorical question to account for the english navy's strategy in norway. c. it accounts for the english navy's failure to protect norway and reassures the nation that it can defend england. d. it reminds the english people that they have an effective submarine force to defend britain.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 18:00
Mr. pontellier did not attend these soirĂŠe musicales. he considered them bourgeois, and found more diversion at the club. to madame ratignolle he said the music dispensed at her soirĂŠes was too "heavy," too far beyond his untrained comprehension. his excuse flattered her. but she disapproved of mr. pontellier's club, and she was frank enough to tell edna so. which statement best describes the point of view in the excerpt? the third-person point of view is voiced by an objective character in the story. the third-person point of view is voiced by a subjective character in the story. the third-person point of view is an omniscient observer. the third-person point of view is an observer with limited omniscience.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:00
Me for the love of god. i've been working on this assignment for 3 days and i don't understand the speeches at all ive read both 4 times over and i don't understand either of them if your right i will give you brainlest (i think that's how you spell it) and 99 pts. for this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. • patrick henry’s “give me liberty, or give me death! ” speech (1775) • frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852) 1. what is the speaker’s viewpoint? what is his claim? type your answer here. (score for question 2: of 2 points) 2. what reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? type your answer here. (score for question 3: of 4 points) 3. how valid are the speaker’s reasons for his claim? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 4: of 2 points) 4. what evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? type your answer here. (score for question 5: of 4 points) 5. is the speaker’s evidence relevant and sufficient? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 6: of 4 points) 6. does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. type your answer here. (score for question 7: of 4 points) 7. what counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? type your answer here. (score for question 8: of 4 points) 8. how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 9: of 4 points) 9. write a one-paragraph evaluation of the speaker’s argument. type your answer here.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 07:50
Why does the author's description of the mercury boiler—"the mercury, when vaporized, going into a mercury turbine and then into a condenser, remaining hot enough to generate steam in a steam boiler"—intentionally incorporate such highly technical language? using technical language establishes the expertise of the writer and convey the complex nature of the process being described. using technical language allows the writer to subtly poke fun at those who seek to make basic processes seem overly complicated. using technical language encourages readers to develop deeper and more meaningful personal connections to the information. using technical language lets the writer make clear to readers that the article is intended for readers who are themselves experts on electricity.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:00
Which aspect of anse’s narration as i lay dying most clearly makes him an unreliable narrator?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Read this excerpt from winston churchill's "their finest hour" speech: some people will ask why, th...
Questions
question
English, 27.12.2020 18:40
question
Mathematics, 27.12.2020 18:50
question
World Languages, 27.12.2020 18:50
question
Mathematics, 27.12.2020 18:50
question
Social Studies, 27.12.2020 19:00
Questions on the website: 13722359