In the passage nothing to envy Why might the author of this text, Barbara Demick, have chosen to use the North Korean version of certain terms, like inminban, instead of the English translation? Analyze the impact that Demick’s use of key North Korean terms has on the text. What do these terms mean? How does their use impact the meaning and tone of the text?

The author chooses to use the North Korean version of certain words in order to show their identity, and the impact that North Korean culture and the North Korean situation had on her.

When analyzing the use of these terms, the purpose of the author should be kept in mind. The purpose is to inform the reader of horrible situations that were occurring in North Korea, and to create awareness about those situations.

Using these North Korean version of words steps away from the objective, third-person view and helps the reader "understand" North Korean culture and their style of living more.

As for the term you provided (inminban), it is a "neighborhood watch system" in where people "watch over" each other and ensure that no one is doing anything wrong. This is alike to the 1984 situation of Big Brother.

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

many were disgusted, nauseated and shook their heads with disapproval upon finding out about the recycling of water process. however, they do not seem to understand that this process actually saves water.

although individuals may argue that it is unhealthy, and or unsafe to drink water that is "from toilet to tap" , the water is 100% safe to drink and involves forcing the water across a membrane, which "removes   any impurities, including viruses, pharmaceuticals and dissolved minerals" , according to paul rozin, a psychology professor who studies revulsion.

i agree that that the thought of drinking water that once ran through someones kitchen sink isn't quite appealing, but recycled wastewater is safe to drink. it also saves water. "the city produces nine million gallons a day" claims russell schreiber, the city’s director of public works.

recycled waste water has absolutely no health concerns whatsoever. when wastewater goes into a system, it's absorbed back into the ground. thus, it goes into a sewer system, then goes through a treatment process that removes contaminants before being released. nonetheless, there is no problem in drinking water that has been recycled.

"in drought-ed california, there are six state agencies that use wastewater that comes from an intellectual property source," according to the university of california, riverside. studies show that this water is completely safe to drink, however, it still doesn't mean people are going to happily pour it in a water glass.

researchers hope it "may make consumers more amenable to drinking recycled wastewater," extraordinarily, women who have a higher "disgust reaction" and make most consumer purchasing decisions.

bc

explanation:

because it crosses through the circle twice