Opinion o Assertion 1. From my point of view, mobile games have positive and negative effects to the player.
2. It seems to me that Prof. Bean is a good historian and his class is
interesting.
3. If the item will not arrived tomorrow, I will cancel the order.
4. There is no doubt that my friend is not familiar with the address.
5. Vaccine will not be available until January 2021.
6. Traveling makes us more tolerant.
7. Drinking coffee is good for your health.
8. In my experience, reading sharpens my memory.
9. Walking is a good exercise.
10. I am convinced that eating too many processed food isn't good for our
health.

its d because i know

idk

explanation:

insert-draw-chart-arrow

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.