The proponents of the soda ban believe that it is the govermment's duty to look after its citizens. However, the opponents of the soda ban think that government's interference in people's lives is a threat to their .freedom
If we compare the soda ban to the cov vaccine, do you think that the government must force all people to take shots? Explain your position

looks good to me! send it in!

explanation:

judge is the correct answer

to eliminate ambiguous remote or broad reference it is necessary to focus on anaphoric reference. by definition "anaphoric reference means that a word in a text refers back to other ideas in the text for its meaning." the references should be clear and leave no room for ambiguity.

in the first case the pronoun it probably refers to the car but it has not been mentioned before so we should replace it for the car. in doing so the statement becomes clear.

in sentence number   two   the pronoun he refers to charles dickens the author. yet, the first half of the sentence is about the book a tale of two cities. to repair this it would be better to rephrase the first half : after i read   a tale of two cities by dickens, he so as to remove the remote reference.