Read the excerpt from Greta Thunberg’s speech at the United Nations Climate Action Summit. So a 50% risk is simply not acceptable to us—we who have to live with the consequences. To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise—the best odds given by the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]—the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on January 1, 2018. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons. How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just "business as usual” and some technical solutions? With today’s emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years. How does the underlined rhetorical question support the claim that current efforts to reduce CO2 emissions are ineffective? by presenting a solution to the problems of not addressing CO2 emissions sooner by emphasizing that the audience is not trying hard enough to reduce CO2 emissions by highlighting the pattern in global temperature rises that cause CO2 emissions to increase by focusing on methods that would be most effective at immediately reducing CO2 emissions

swjdwnb xe xh s hbw hwshjwhjwbhuwvvgw gw ggwgx gwxyw bw gwvwhg wgw g wgwuowwh gww hjw ywbdubwhsqgsw sghw hwbsuwhsioqhusbjw sjw sbw sgwvysbwhj wb w hjw hw b whsbwhsnjw sbw shwbjsqm sbw hsbqhmbsjmwqshjqwbhwwand gthat the answer to the qusebde dhe dhebdh edh   hw dhwbjdnwkjd nw dnw nwns wnj nw hw dwdedeeddwcdw

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).

play black ops 4 answer a