What did William carlos Williams mean when he said no ideas but in things

ethos, logos, and pathos.

it about a duaghter

explanation: sorry thats all i could give i cant see the passage really

the sentence that best describes the tone of the passage from the radio broadcast compared to the passage from the book is b. the radio broadcast has a more surprised tone.

consider the text evidence: in the passage from the book, the description is more matter-of-fact. it is simply describing the things resembling little grey snakes, but there is no urgency in the description. on the other hand, in the passage from the radio broadcast, there is definetely urgency (you can tell from the expression used, "good heavens", which clearly indicates surprise.)

do you want me to proof read it?