Throughout most of the book, the point of view is limited to Wiesel at the age when the events are happening. Why on page 34 does the author choose to break format and comment on the events of the book from his adult perspective? How does the author's use of language and tone contribute to his purpose when he addresses the things he will never forget? Write an essay of at least 300 words exploring these ideas and cite specific evidence from the text in your answer.

ey information about pap? physical description beliefs actions interactions

the manager emerges. taking marlow aside, he says they have done all they can for kurtz. he adds that kurtz did more harm than good for the company. his actions were too "vigorous" for the moment. the manager says that kurtz was unethically gathering ivory by exploiting the locals. this, of course, is rather ironic coming from a guy who makes his living by exploiting the locals in the worst ways.

explanation: