Which "rule" is typical in a writing workshop or peer review session? I HAVE THE ANSWER LOOK A) Each reader must speak only once and for a set and equal period of time.
B) The writer of the draft should introduce it by explaining why he or she wrote it that way.
C) Readers (reviewers) should argue their points of view as in a formal debate.
D) The writer should just listen to the readers' feedback, without explaining or justifying.

I put "The writer of the draft should introduce it by explaining why he or she wrote it that way" because of the verified answer to this same question that someone else asked but it was WRONG. I'm not sure what the answer is but the text that popped up under the question after I submitted my exam was "If the writer is focused on defending all the decisions made while writing the draft, he or she is unlikely to learn much from the readers." So choose one that matches this text, hope this helps!!

The arctic national wildlife refuge is home to caribou, moose, musk oxen, wolves, foxes, grizzlies, polar bears and migratory birds. leaders in the oil industry believe the refuge is the perfect site for the “environmentally sensitive exploration” of oil. environmentalists are wondering: what will become of the wildlife? president george w. bush, oil-industry leaders and others believe that americans will benefit from the oil that lies under the snow-filled surface of the refuge. in their opinion, the oil will reduce high fuel prices and decrease our need for oil from other countries. i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? americans are the largest consumers of oil. instead of drilling for oil, we should decrease our need for foreign oil simply by using less. we must all work together to cut back on the oil we use in order to preserve the wildlife of the arctic national wildlife refuge. what type of argument is used in this paragraph? i believe the cost of such drilling is too high. i agree with environmentalists who fear that drilling will disturb the migration of more than 130,000 caribou. each spring, the caribou travel 400 miles to give birth on the coastal plain. in this area of the refuge, there are fewer predators. in addition, experts say that the oil in the area adds up to less than a six-month supply. is such a small amount of oil worth the risk drilling poses to these animals? a. appeal to emotion c. appeal to logic b. bandwagon d. none of the above select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d