Friendly letter There was a misunderstanding between you and your close frlend when you were a party

I am assuming this is were someone invited you to a party and you wanted to bring your best friend along, but they're not allowed.

Explanation:

This is an open response so there's no right or wrong answer. Here's what I remember writing though.

"I'll still go to the party. If they're really my true best friend, then they must understand that I'd still like to go to the party no matter if they're coming with me or not. If my best friend gets upset that I went to the party well that's on them. I'm my own person they don't enforce my decisions if they're not bad." That's all I can remember, hopefully this helps.

the answer is both an appeal to ethos and logos (if that's what your question options were)

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.