Does the author succeed in supporting the claim that "In no other department is a thorough knowledge of history so important as in philosophy"?
1. Yes, because he gives examples of why knowledge of history is vital to philosophy.
2. Yes, because he proves that other departments of thought are not reliant on historical knowledge.
3. No, because he proceeds to explain why knowledge of history is as important to other disciplines.
O 4. No, because he digresses into another topic and does not address historicallynowledge.

Read the excerpt from "politics and the english language" by george orwell. by this morning’s post i have received a pamphlet dealing with conditions in germany. the author tells me that he "felt impelled” to write it. i open it at random, and here is almost the first sentence that i see: "[the allies] have an opportunity not only of achieving a radical transformation of germany’s social and political structure in such a way as to avoid a nationalistic reaction in germany itself, but at the same time of laying the foundations of a cooperative and unified europe.” which statement is correct? orwell uses an example and statistical evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses an example and a quotation for evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses hypothetical and factual evidence in this excerpt. orwell uses hypothetical and statistical evidence in this excerpt.

The_of a story can be applied to other works of literature or to life.

Assuming that the character maydelle is a symbol what does she most plausibly represent