Write a review of the two performances of a scene from Shakespeare's The Tempest in this lesson. First, identify Shakespeare's purpose as it relates to colonialism and imperialism. Then explain how well each performance achieves that purpose, supporting your opinion with evidence. Note that your objective in this assignment is to provide an evaluation, not just an analysis. You're making a judgment about which of the two performances does a better job of conveying Shakespeare's intent in The Tempest, based on factors like costumes, acting, casting, sets, and directing. Your assignment should include the following elements: • An explanation of Shakespeare's purpose, as it relates to imperialism and colonialism, in The Tempest • Evidence from the play that supports your opinion about Shakespeare's purpose • A claim that explains which performance accomplishes that purpose better • Examples from both performances that support your evaluation • An introduction paragraph, body paragraphs, and a conclusion paragraph • Transitions that carry the reader smoothly from one idea to the next and from one paragraph to the next

Read this excerpt from "we shall overcome." hundreds of thousands of people sang them. but sometimes, it was one lone person with a guitar. they sang in segregated bus stations, picket lines, freedom marches, concert stadiums, city squares, and videos. when injustice of oppression threatens, people sing protest songs to proclaim their resistance, publicize their cause, and encourage hope for a better future, based on this excerpt as an introductory paragraph, which of the following would you expect to read about in the article? different groups of people who were oppressed the ways that music brings diverse groups of people together similarities between historical movements that provided rights for groups of people different song styles throughout specific historical events

Me with english (easy for you) 50 points

Read these paragraphs from the story. i told him my address. it would take an hour’s quick walk to get back home. “it’s like this,” he said. “we’ll look at the matter straight. if you go back home tonight, you take your chance of accidents. a cart may run over you, and there’s always banana skins and orange peel, to say nothing of fallen ladders.” he spoke of the improbable with an intense seriousness that would have been laughable six hours before. but i did not laugh. what does this interaction between the two men reveal about james? james is skeptical and thinks mr. atkinson is overreacting to the situation. james is dismayed by the things mr. atkinson says and begins to feel uncomfortable. james is surprised by mr. atkinson's solemnness and thinks there is value in what the man is saying. james is appreciative of mr. atkinson's concern and wonders if he should hurry home. the correct answer is; "james is surprised by mr. atkinson's solemnness and thinks there is value in what the man is saying." i am not putting this up so someone can answer but so when people search this they will know the correct the correct answer is not; "james is skeptical and thinks mr. atkinson is overreacting to the situation." everyone said that was the right answer but its your