Ancient Rome is credited for a period of stability and prosperity without equal before or after (at least until the 19th century). although Romans were disproportionally benefited, conquered territories/cultures benefited of some level of progress and stability because Rome had a PATERNALISTIC/IMPERIALIST POLICY. Is paternalism/imperialism ever right/moral? By the principle of "the lesser of two evils", should we admit that some territories/cultures are unable to progress if left to their own governing? Many ex-colonies are stuck in the third world, often times because of corruption. At the moment, Venezuela is in a position were many want the United Stated to intervene... Should we?​

when alex falls for the charming new boy at school, cole -- a handsome, funny, sports star who adores her - she can't believe she's finally found her soul who truly loves and understands her.  

at first, alex is blissfully happy. sure, cole seems a little jealous of her relationship with her close friend zack, but what guy would want his girlfriend spending all her time with another boy? as the months pass, though, alex can no longer ignore cole's small put-downs, pinches, or increasingly violent threats.  

as alex struggles to come to terms with the sweet boyfriend she fell in love with and the boyfriend whose "love" she no longer recognizes, she is forced to choose -- between her "true love" and herself.

explanation:

it is believed to be alfred, lord himself

a. she is a young, beautiful woman who deeply cares about her husband.

is correct

can you explain your question better