NO LINKS OR ELSE YOU'LL BE REPORTED! Only answer if you're very good at English. No guessing please. Author's point of view: Video games have negative effects on teenagers.

Conflicting Point of View: Video games are fun.

Author's Response: Video games caused one teenager to fail in school.

What was the author's purpose for writing this post?

A: To inform teenagers about the negative studies related to video games.

B: To explain to teenagers that video games make them lazy.

C: To pursuade teenagers to play more educational games.

D: To convince teenagers to stop playing video games.​

D. To educate teens of the many negative points of playing them , as well as the value of doing other things instead.

D. To convince teenagers to stop playing video games.

Explanation:

The format, structure, and writing syntax of the paragraph implies that the paragraph is an argumentative passage. The author even states, "Go outside!" which eliminates answer choices C, because the author does not advocate for teenagers to play more educational games. Answer choices A and B are not supported because there is insufficient evidence to support the statements being made in those answer choices. In addition, both answer choices A and B do not represent a goal of an argumentative passage. Therefore, the answer is D. To convince teenagers to stop playing video games.

click on your photo icon on top right and click edit profile you should be able to change it from there

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war