Read the following excerpt from an article : Jed Blake unfairly criticized the government's handling of a national security threat. He made numerous points on the topic, supporting them all with allusions to recent events. Which statement best describes this article's level of subjectivity or objectivity ? A. The article is attempting to be subjective , but it really objective B. The article contains some subjectivity . C. The article is entirely objective . The article is attempting to be objective , but it is really subjective .

The correct answer is D) The article is attempting to be objective, but it is really subjective.

The statement that best describes this article's level of subjectivity or objectivity is "The article is attempting to be objective, but it is really subjective."

The reason is that Jed Blake unfairly criticized the government's handling of a national security threat. This means that he is using light arguments or general opinions that are not firmly supported by proper sources to critique the US government.

It is said that Blake made numerous points on the topic, supporting them all with allusions to recent events. This means that his support was allusions to recent events or incidents, but he is not really supporting those events or is making his point clear based on data, statistics, proper primary or secondary sources. It seems that he is only sharing his opinion in his article.

faithful servants eumaeus and philaetius:

his ragged vest then drawn aside disclosed the sign conspicuous, and the scar exposed: eager they view'd, with joy they stood amazed with tearful eyes o'er all their master gazed:

these servants know ulysses by the scar he got when he was a child - so when he showed them the mark, they immediately knew this is truly their master and they hugged him, finally starting to believe his words.

what arguments, appeals, and rhetorical strategies did patrick henry use in 1775 to persuade reluctant members of the second virginia convention to develop a military response to british aggression or n 1775 american independence was not a foregone conclusion. while there had been unrest and resistance in massachusetts with scattered acts of support from other areas, no organized movement toward revolution existed across the colonies. virginia ranked among the largest, wealthiest, and most populous colonies in 1775, and her political and military support for independence would be crucial for success. in this speech patrick henry (1736–1799) uses powerful rhetoric to convince influential, affluent, landed men of virginia with much to lose to move past their current diplomatic posture opposing british aggression to the more treasonous one of open military preparedness. hope it

explanation:

i just had to do some research a while stayed up all night