Which best explains why the delivery of William Faulkner's Nobel Prize speech does not support its rhetoric and purpose?
A. The purpose is to congratulate, but the delivery fails in its
missionn.
B. The language is too lofty and poetic for the purpose of the speech.
C. The manner in which he speaks does not match the confidence of
the message.
D. The southern accent makes it difficult for the listener to
understand.

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest

tom robinson he was a black man that was accused of raping caucasian woman, and an idealistic lawyer offers to defend him. which makes nobody believe in the innocence of a negro.

you should start by saying what they did to these subjects hope that this

comfort   in their suffering