subject
English, 16.05.2021 05:30 Ryan02717

What evidence from the text best supports the following analysis: By juxtaposing contrasting settings where Blacks are denied entry, MLK emphasizes the great extent of segregation and the limited space where Blacks can coexist with Whites as equal in order to illustrate the restrictions that leave African Americans with no other choice than to fight for equal access. * "We can never be satisfied, as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities."
"We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality."
"We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating 'For Whites Only.”
"We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro’s basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one."

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
Andy bernard laughed at my joke, spitting out his water. complete thought incomplete thought
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 09:30
Which translations would fit in the blank in order to most effectively link reasons to evidence a: for example b: similarly c: however d: on the other hand
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 11:20
Vocucot questions for drainstorming and organizing your ideas1. which part of abbey's rhetoric will you discuss in your letter? nfallacy that you want to criticize and baln him
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 12:30
In this excerpt from "quality" by john galsworthy, which two parts clearly indicate the literary point of view of the essay? that tenement had a certain quiet distinction; there was no sign upon its face that he made for any of the royal family—merely his own german name of gessler brothers; and in the window a few pairs of boots. i remember that it always troubled me to account for those unvarying boots in the window, for he made only what was ordered, reaching nothing down, and it seemed so inconceivable that what he made could ever have failed to fit. had he bought them to put there? that, too, seemed inconceivable. he would never have tolerated in his house leather on which he had not worked himself. besides, they were too beautiful—the pair of pumps, so inexpressibly slim, the patent leathers with cloth tops, making water come into one's mouth, the tall brown riding boots with marvellous sooty glow, as if, though new, they had been worn a hundred years. those pairs could only have been made by one who saw before him the soul of boot—so truly were they prototypes incarnating the very spirit of all foot-gear. these thoughts, of course, came to me later, though even when i was promoted to him, at the age of perhaps fourteen, some inkling haunted me of the dignity of himself and brother. for to make boots—such boots as he made—seemed to me then, and still seems to me, mysterious and wonderful.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What evidence from the text best supports the following analysis: By juxtaposing contrasting setting...
Questions
question
History, 07.11.2019 04:31
question
Arts, 07.11.2019 04:31
Questions on the website: 13722363