. In his Message to Congress "On Indian Removal," Andrew Jackson uses words with negative connotations to refer to American Indians. Similarly, in "Samuel's Memory," Michael Rutledge uses words with negative connotations to refer to the people who removed Native Americans from their land. Describe the terms each author uses and explain how the negative connotations of these words contribute to the tone of each passage. Be sure to refer to each author's specific word choice in your response and introduce your topic, develop your topic, use transitions, and provide a concluding statement (15 points).

Healthcare costs are becoming an issue for many americans. in just two years, the average family has seen an increase of 3 percent in insurance costs. the increase rises to 25 percent when you include families who buy insurance on an exchange. at this rate, health care will soon be completely unaffordable for most americans. therefore, lowering the cost of health insurance must be a priority for lawmakers. which statement best explains why the argument is logical? a.)the argument incorporates empirical and anecdotal evidence. b.)the argument includes a strong counterclaim and a fair rebuttal. c.)the argument contains relevant reasons supported with facts and data. d.)the argument includes a personal experience as an emotional appeal.

Read this passage from "the city without us" by alan weisman: which statement best explains how the structure of the passage supports the author's purpose? a. the passage traces several events in the order that they will occur to highlight how nature conquers human civilization. b. the passage shows that natural forces such as an absence of predators and an increase in the squirrel population can lead to destructive results. c. the passage shows that natural forms such as an absence of predators and human hunters can lead to the reforestation of new york city. d. the passage identifies how two natural forces are co-dependent - the deforestation of new york and the extinction of squirrels.

What is the missing statement in step 3 of the proof? given: z1 is complementary to 22. 22 is complementary to 23. prove: m_1 = m23 m21 = m2 m2 1 + m22 = 90° m22 = m23 m22 + m23 = 180° 2 statements 21 is comp. to 22 2. 22 is comp. to 23 3. ? 4. mz1 - 90°-m22 m22+m23 = 90° 6. m23 = 90°-m22 7 m21 - m23 reasons 1. given 2. given 3. def of comp. zs 4. subtr equality prop. 5. def. of comp. 25 6 subtr. equality prop 17. trans. prop. vo